* Tried to fill in application_name in awx/__init__.py but I think that
is too late
* Fill in database application_name with enough information to easily
trace the connection from postgres back to the node and pid that
initiated the connection.
* Set application_name in django settings so that application_name is
set _before_ the first postgres connection is established.
Annotations are only supported for ingress and service accounts
This PR will allow you now to specify annotations for Kubernetes Deployment
resources by defining `kubernetes_deployment_annotations` var list
* Do not query the database for the set of Instance that belong to the
group for which we are trying to fit a job on, for each job.
* Instead, cache the set of instances per-instance group.
* We update the parent unified job template to point at new jobs
created. We also update a similar foreign key when the job finishes
running. This causes lock contention when the job template is
allow_simultaneous and there are a lot of jobs from that job template
running in parallel. I've seen as bad as 5 minutes waiting for the lock
when a job finishes.
* This change moves the parent->child update to OUTSIDE of the
transaction if the job is allow_simultaneous (inherited from the parent
unified job). We sacrafice a bit of correctness for performance. The
logic is, if you are launching 1,000 parallel jobs do you really care
that the job template contains a pointer to the last one you launched?
Probably not. If you do, you can always query jobs related to the job
template sorted by created time.
* Do not query the database for the set of Instance that belong to the
group for which we are trying to fit a job on, for each job.
* Instead, cache the set of instances per-instance group.
* We update the parent unified job template to point at new jobs
created. We also update a similar foreign key when the job finishes
running. This causes lock contention when the job template is
allow_simultaneous and there are a lot of jobs from that job template
running in parallel. I've seen as bad as 5 minutes waiting for the lock
when a job finishes.
* This change moves the parent->child update to OUTSIDE of the
transaction if the job is allow_simultaneous (inherited from the parent
unified job). We sacrafice a bit of correctness for performance. The
logic is, if you are launching 1,000 parallel jobs do you really care
that the job template contains a pointer to the last one you launched?
Probably not. If you do, you can always query jobs related to the job
template sorted by created time.
* fixes#8347
* Rename inventory_source to name in the tower_inventory_source_update
* Allow to specify both name or id for `name` and `inventory` params
